// Work

Systems that shipped. Numbers that held.

Five recent builds — the tangle each client started with, what got wired, and what the instruments read afterward. Measured, not asserted.

CLIENT NAMES WITHHELD UNDER NDA · SPECIFICS AVAILABLE LIVE ON THE AUDIT CALL

CASE 01 · AI PLATFORM GOVERNANCE Enterprise customer data platform

An internal AI platform,
allowed to touch the CRM safely.

The tangle

An internally engineered AI workbench with connectors into Slack, email, and HubSpot through an OAuth app. The question nobody had verified: when the AI acts on a user's behalf, does it inherit that user's permissions, or the app's? Nobody wanted to learn the answer in production.

What got wired

  • Deterministic regression suite: user personas (view-only, team-scoped, admin) × read and write operations, tested against what each persona can actually do in the UI
  • Proved the critical mismatch: view-only users could complete writes through the app, because OAuth scopes authorize the application at the portal level while user permissions govern the UI. Escalated with reproducible evidence to HubSpot solutions architecture
  • Diagnosed the token layer underneath: a shared app token acts regardless of who is asking, so permission parity requires per-user, session-initiated tokens with minimized scopes
  • The permission-parity suite now runs as the regression gate as the platform adds connectors
View-onlywrite
Privilege gap proven
Appuser tokens
Architecture diagnosis
UI parity
The governance bar
CASE 02 · ROUTING & DATA Security-first B2B software · global

Fifteen hours of routing latency,
engineered down to six minutes.

The tangle

Two CRMs that disagreed with each other, duplicate accounts everywhere, and a patchwork of legacy workflow automation stacked over years. Inherited architecture → degraded performance → 15-hour routing latency, with high-intent trial signups sitting unowned at the end of it.

What got wired

  • Full dedupe across Salesforce + HubSpot — accounts, contacts, hierarchies
  • Lead grading hierarchy (fit + intent) computed on entry, synced to CRM in seconds
  • Round-robin routing to reps with re-enrollment — nothing falls through twice
  • AI agent workflows (Claude) running the dedupe, enrichment, and grading passes, governed with dry runs, backups, and human review on every batch
  • Governed deployments: changes built and QA'd in sandbox with Claude Code, shipped through peer reviewed pull requests and automated deploy tooling
15h<6m
Speed to lead
16s
Grade → CRM sync
21
Sources of truth
CASE 03 · LIFECYCLE & NURTURE Governance-tech SaaS · seed stage

An assessment funnel,
wired end to end.

The tangle

A founder launching a scored self-assessment as her growth engine — with no marketing infrastructure behind it. Results needed to segment into three buyer paths, each with its own branched nurture, before a hard launch date.

What got wired

  • Assessment platform → HubSpot integration: field mapping, exact-value contracts, QA'd with a full test cohort
  • 22 marketing emails + 4 branched journeys segmented by role, timing, and readiness
  • Compliance, sending domain, and handover docs — the team runs it without me
17s
Assessment → first email
22
Emails built & live
4
Branched journeys
CASE 04 · SIGNALS & ALERTS Healthcare AI · enterprise sales

Buyer intent, routed to
the rep the same day.

The tangle

Nine-figure pipeline concentrated in a handful of enterprise accounts — and buying-committee research happening on the website that nobody saw until the next QBR. Intent data existed; it just never reached a human in time to act.

What got wired

  • Intent monitoring scoped to the accounts behind the top 20 open deals
  • Signal-triggered workflow: intent spike on an open-deal account → same-day internal alert to the deal owner
  • ABM target structure built for the expansion motion behind it
Top 20
Open deals covered
Same-day
Signal → owner alert
QBRlive
Intent visibility
CASE 05 · PIPELINE & FORECAST Managed cybersecurity provider · mid-market

A CRM the leadership team
could finally forecast from.

The tangle

A growing MSSP whose CRM had drifted: pipeline stages that didn't match how deals actually closed, lifecycle data years stale, and no automation carrying deals forward — every report started with an apology.

What got wired

  • Sales pipeline redesigned in place — no downtime, no lost history
  • 13 live workflows: stage hygiene, stuck-deal alerts, closed-won handoff, lifecycle sync
  • Lifecycle cleanup across the whole customer base + forecasting enabled for leadership
13
Workflows live
248
Records lifecycle-corrected
0
Downtime during rebuild

// Client names withheld — I'll walk through any of these builds live, specifics included. Book the audit →

// Your turn

What would your numbers read?

Thirty minutes, no cost, no pitch. Tell me what's tangled — I'll map the three fixes worth making first.